I have listened to and acknowledged the concerns that are raised by the other side and by Mr. Perlmutter from our side about this provision. It is clear that certainty has value. But certainty when certainty is unfair and when you are trying to discourage a particular act such as steering a borrower to a higher priced loan, if you don't put in the bill the ability of people to get the actual damages that they incur as a result of being steered to a higher priced loan, then you are not going to deter the activity. Many unsavory people will treat this just as a cost of doing business because the reward for steering is so high that they can incur that risk for nine transactions and get rewarded and pay the cost of the risk on the one transaction that they might get caught on. So if you really want to deter people from steering to the highest cost loan, you've got to provide an effective remedy that deters them from doing that. That's all I am trying to do.
Melvin Watt: “I have listened to and acknowledged the concerns that are raised by the other side and by Mr. Perlmutter from our side…”
On the recordNovember 15, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the need for effective remedies against steering borrowers to higher priced loans.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
Sep 26, 2018
I am a big supporter of the MeToo Movement. I think it is a wonderful thing, but it cannot be a substitute for going through the legal process.
Dec 12, 2013
This is definitely the last time I will be addressing this House. As my colleague, David Price, has indicated, I have been confirmed to a new position as regulator and director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. I just wanted to take a…
Oct 2, 2017
I don't think you would want either Republicans or Democrats, I don't think either one would want 15, 20 percent of their economy in conservatorship for years and years.





