as masterful as the chairman who spoke on behalf of the Committee on Armed Services is, he cannot speak for the Committee on Armed Services. We bring a major substantive change to this bill to the floor, give it 10 minutes of debate, 5 minutes per side; never has been in the Committee on Armed Services. The chairman of the committee comes out and says I am here to speak for the committee. What about all the other people on the Committee on Armed Services? When are they going to have an opportunity to weigh in on this major substantive provision to this bill? That is what I am talking about when I say we have subverted the processes of this House using parliamentary procedures. Basically, what we have done is deprive the minority of the Committee on Armed Services of the right to weigh in on this important issue. The chairman waived jurisdiction. They did not bring it into the committee, and they did not do anything. There are 60 Members. Fifty-nine of them have not spoken.
Melvin Watt: “as masterful as the chairman who spoke on behalf of the Committee on Armed Services is, he cannot speak for the…”
On the recordSeptember 30, 1999
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the process of debate on a bill in the Committee on Armed Services.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
May 22, 2018
What was needed in this industry was somebody to make responsible decisions and not let access overburden safety and soundness.
May 22, 2018
What we learned, first and foremost, is that having one foot in the public sector and one foot in the private sector does not work because when you have a foot in the public sector, taxpayers take the risk, and a foot in the private…
Oct 2, 2017
I don't think you would want either Republicans or Democrats, I don't think either one would want 15, 20 percent of their economy in conservatorship for years and years.
Sep 26, 2018
A presumption of innocence is foundational to our society, as is due process.





