I am surprised to hear the gentleman concede that funds under this bill could in fact be used to improve roads and highways and streets. I thought clearly that was not a purpose of this bill. Is the gentleman sure that he wants to concede that point?
Questioning the intended use of funds in a bill during a House debate.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
What was needed in this industry was somebody to make responsible decisions and not let access overburden safety and soundness.
A presumption of innocence is foundational to our society, as is due process.
It is intolerable to me to think that a mere accusation of impropriety would somehow deny him the presumption of innocence.
I am a big supporter of the MeToo Movement. I think it is a wonderful thing, but it cannot be a substitute for going through the legal process.
Other voices in this conversation
