Mr. Speaker, I am rising in opposition to the rule on this bill. I rise in opposition to the rule because the Committee on Rules ruled that an amendment that I attempted to offer on the floor was not in order. I think the Committee on Rules should have made my amendment in order. There is not a person in this house or in our country, I believe, who would not find offensive and abhorrent the abduction, enslavement, killing, imprisonment, rape, crucifixion or any forms of torture, which this bill condemns and sanctions. This bill condemns and sanctions those forms of torture, but it does it only when the victims are tortured because of religious beliefs. The amendment that I sought to offer would have expanded this bill to offer the same kind of protections for those persecuted because of race, nationality, membership in a particular social group or political opinion.
Melvin Watt: “Mr. Speaker, I am rising in opposition to the rule on this bill. I rise in opposition to the rule because the Committee…”
On the recordMay 14, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing a rule regarding a bill on torture and advocating for broader protections for persecuted individuals.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
Jan 26, 2015
There is nothing worse, I have found, in this area of the market than uncertainty, and the longer this drags out, the more uncertainty there is.
Dec 12, 2013
This is definitely the last time I will be addressing this House. As my colleague, David Price, has indicated, I have been confirmed to a new position as regulator and director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. I just wanted to take a…
Oct 2, 2017
I don't think you would want either Republicans or Democrats, I don't think either one would want 15, 20 percent of their economy in conservatorship for years and years.





