I have an amendment at the desk that has been made in order under the rule. The CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 2, line 9, after the dollar amount insert ``(reduced by $619,200)''. Page 5, line 22, after the dollar amount insert ``(reduced by $619,200)''. Page 6, line 8, after the dollar amount insert ``(reduced by $619,200)''. Page 37, line 7, after the dollar amount insert ``(increased by $619,200)''. The CHAIR. Pursuant to House Resolution 359, the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Watt) and a Member opposed each will control 5 minutes. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from North Carolina.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
I am wondering, if you think this is redundant and extraneous rather than contrary to the intent, why wouldn't we just accept the amendment and keep going?
One of the few important accomplishments of the 112th Congress thus far has been the passage of the America Invents Act, a comprehensive reform of the United States patent system which was signed into law by President Barack Obama on…
Whose time got charged with the last two unanimous consent requests? Both were one sentence, and you're saying they were charged. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from Massachusetts' time has been charged.
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 226, nays 189, not voting 19, as follows: [Roll No. 350] YEAS--226 Aderholt Alexander Amash Amodei Bachmann…





