I thought that we could not in the Committee on the Judiciary make a quick judgment about how to create a level playing field between brick and mortar stores and e-commerce sales. The Commission has failed in my estimation, and I think we do need some kind of extension of the moratorium. I do not think that 5 years is an appropriate extension. I think it is way too long to extend this moratorium, because what we have in addition, related to the moratorium itself, is a companion issue which deals with how we create a level playing field between retailers and other businesses that are operating in brick and mortar stores and people who are selling over the Internet. Right now, brick and mortar stores are at a competitive disadvantage because they have to collect local sales taxes. In many cases, e-commerce is able to evade those local sales taxes, and that puts brick and mortar stores at a competitive disadvantage.
Melvin Watt: “I thought that we could not in the Committee on the Judiciary make a quick judgment about how to create a level playing…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of Internet sales tax and the need for a moratorium extension.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
I want to be clear that the reason I would not raise my hand is because I would not make a unilateral decision.
This is definitely the last time I will be addressing this House. As my colleague, David Price, has indicated, I have been confirmed to a new position as regulator and director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency. I just wanted to take a…
There is no rational reason, if you think about it, why a superior tax lien would be having an interest rate of 10, 11, 12 percent when a lien subordinate to it is going at 4 percent or 5 percent.
Congress has given us this mandate: Do lending, back loans that are safe and sound, and provide liquidity in the market.





