My colleagues, I want to get back to what this debate is about. It is about whether we give unprecedented authority to the Speaker to bring up any legislation at any time with no advance notice, what we call in the vernacular, martial law. I tell you, I cannot think of anybody in this House I would less like to give unprecedented authority to. If I am thinking about who I am going to give some unprecedented authority to, you think I want to give unprecedented authority to somebody who would lead people to take school lunches out of kids' mouths, to take Medicare away from elderly citizens, whose reputation and ethics are at stake and will not allow anybody to talk about it, who does not want to fund education programs for our children? This is the person we are talking about giving unprecedented authority to? I would not think of giving this man unprecedented authority and voting for this rule. I can think of probably 434 other people in this House I would give it to before I would give it to this Speaker.
Melvin Watt: “My colleagues, I want to get back to what this debate is about. It is about whether we give unprecedented authority to…”
On the recordSeptember 24, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Opposing a rule granting the Speaker unprecedented legislative authority.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
Oct 28, 2013
I simply wanted to rise and pay tribute to the memory of my dear friend and colleague, Major Owens, who passed last week. I express my condolences to his family. As new Members, we take for granted sometimes that there is a system in place…
Sep 26, 2018
I am a big supporter of the MeToo Movement. I think it is a wonderful thing, but it cannot be a substitute for going through the legal process.
May 22, 2018
What we learned, first and foremost, is that having one foot in the public sector and one foot in the private sector does not work because when you have a foot in the public sector, taxpayers take the risk, and a foot in the private…





