Reclaiming my time, that was exactly the point I was going to make. So a broader amendment, were it germane to this bill, would probably be received favorably by all of us because we believe that fiduciaries in general should be reporting to the people that they are representing. But when you limit it only to pension plans, you eliminate foundations, you eliminate family trusts, and you eliminate a whole range of other fiduciaries that should have the same obligation. And singling out pension plans in this context I think is the wrong thing to do.
Melvin Watt: “Reclaiming my time, that was exactly the point I was going to make. So a broader amendment, were it germane to this…”
On the recordApril 18, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the limitations of an amendment related to fiduciary responsibilities during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
Sep 26, 2018
I believe that we must listen to the claims of women who come forth with allegations of harassment, abuse, or misconduct.
Sep 26, 2018
I would certainly emphasize that if anybody here has the notion that I believe that I am above the law, they should dissuade themselves of that notion.
Sep 26, 2018
A presumption of innocence is foundational to our society, as is due process.
Sep 26, 2018
If you look at my record throughout my whole life, from the day I started in the practice of law in a civil rights law firm, you will find nobody, or few people, who are more committed to the things that you all have talked about today.





