if we believe in term limits on committee Chairs and limits on proxy voting, then we should vote for it. That is the majority way. That is the democratic way. However, I draw the line when Members start to diminish the value of my vote by requiring a 60-percent rule on anything. That is not the majority way. That is not democracy. That is not any way to treat a minority. I would submit that it is un-American, it is unconstitutional, and the 60-percent rule by majority vote is un-American and unconstitutional. I ask you to vote against this idiocy.
Melvin Watt: “if we believe in term limits on committee Chairs and limits on proxy voting, then we should vote for it. That is the…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the implementation of a 60-percent rule for voting in Congress.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
But that is not a justification for an individual member of a collaborative body to make a unilateral decision to turn over confidential information.
I have an amendment at the desk which was made in order under the rule. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 5, insert the following after line 23 and redesignate…
I don't think there is any question that somebody who gets good homeownership counseling, either pre-ownership, or in some cases post-ownership--it makes them better borrowers.
Woman, I thank the gentleman for yielding. I am pained to be here today in opposition to this bill. I stood shoulder to shoulder with the chair of our full committee 2 years ago in patent reform after working almost 6 years to find…





