I just want to submit to the Speaker that this debate is about yielding unprecedented authority to the Speaker of the House. The Speaker's integrity, the person to whom we are proposing to yield that authority, his integrity is at the heart of the matter. If we cannot get to his integrity, then how can we determine whether we ought to be yielding these unprecedented, overwhelming authorities to him? If we do not like what he has been doing, if he has been out disrespecting the House of the United States, then why should we give him some unprecedented authority called martial law? That is at the very heart. His responsibility, his ethics, are at the very heart of the matter. I would submit, Mr. Speaker, that this is germane to the issues and the matter before this House.
Melvin Watt: “I just want to submit to the Speaker that this debate is about yielding unprecedented authority to the Speaker of the…”
On the recordSeptember 24, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about granting authority to the Speaker of the House.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
Sep 26, 2018
I am a big supporter of the MeToo Movement. I think it is a wonderful thing, but it cannot be a substitute for going through the legal process.
May 22, 2018
What was needed in this industry was somebody to make responsible decisions and not let access overburden safety and soundness.
Sep 26, 2018
Due process cannot be dispensed in 5-minute exchanges of questions and answers, or by politicians...
Dec 5, 2013
I thank the gentleman for yielding time. Mr. Chairman, I want to rise not so much in opposition to the manager's amendment, but in opposition to the bill and so that we can try to make sure that people understand what it is that they are…





