I don't understand the rationale of my colleagues. And it would be something else if this bill were going to see the light of day in the Senate. It's not going anywhere. This is a message bill, Mr. Chairman. That's all this is about. Let's send a message to the American people that we can cut. Whether we're cutting money that's taxpayer money or cutting money that's going to be paid out of the top fund that the law requires the biggest financial institutions in America to make the taxpayers whole, if, at the end of the day there is a deficit in repaying this money, it doesn't matter. Let's just stand up and beat on our chest and say to the American people and think that they will believe that we are doing something to save them tax dollars. This bill saves no tax dollars, and it's an abomination.
Editor's note · Context
The speaker criticizes a bill as ineffective and merely symbolic, arguing it does not save taxpayer money.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
I have an amendment at the desk. The Acting CHAIR. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 3, line 18, strike ``or (d)'' and insert the following: ``(d), or (e)''. Page 5, insert after line 7…
I thank the Chair. {time} 1710 Let me say this: This is kind of an awkward conversation because we did have this discussion in committee. We were advised in committee that the preemption language would be corrected between the committee…
I ask unanimous consent to restore the time to the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern). The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the gentleman from North Carolina?
On that I demand the yeas and nays. The yeas and nays were ordered. The vote was taken by electronic device, and there were--yeas 226, nays 189, not voting 19, as follows: [Roll No. 350] YEAS--226 Aderholt Alexander Amash Amodei Bachmann…





