I will tell my colleagues that this bill has not come to either one of those committees for hearings or consideration. It was simply brought to the floor so that we could deal with it on April 15, tax day, so that it could be the backdrop for a political debate on an issue that really needs substantive deliberate consideration. When we talk about doing away with the concept of majority rule, what we are doing is undermining the basic fabric and principle of the Constitution and the democracy that we are sent here to represent. So this whole notion that we can take one-third or one-fourth of our Members and tie up the whole process and make them a majority is counter democratic. Mr. Speaker, I have been arguing with my colleagues all this term that this whole concept of undermining the Constitution is not a conservative concept.
Melvin Watt: “I will tell my colleagues that this bill has not come to either one of those committees for hearings or consideration.…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the lack of committee consideration for a bill during a debate.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
if you look at my record throughout my whole life, from the day I started in the practice of law in a civil rights law firm, you will find nobody, or few people, who are more committed to the things that you all have talked about today.
But that is not a justification for an individual member of a collaborative body to make a unilateral decision to turn over confidential information.
What was needed in this industry was somebody to make responsible decisions and not let access overburden safety and soundness.
This is in line with my consistently repeated belief that it is the role of Congress, not FHFA, to decide on housing finance reform.





