I oppose the estate tax provisions in this bill, and I'm thankful that the rule would allow us to vote against this estate tax. But I also oppose the extension of the high income tax cuts, and I oppose the way we are doing the Social Security situation because I think it will result in damage to Social Security. And this rule does not give me the opportunity to vote against those two things. And therefore, it's my intention to vote against the rule. I've tried to make it clear to my leadership that I think it's important for me to have that vote on those two issues, and they haven't seen fit to make that in order. So I feel like I must, under those circumstances, vote against the rule.
Melvin Watt: “I oppose the estate tax provisions in this bill, and I'm thankful that the rule would allow us to vote against this…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses opposition to estate tax provisions and high income tax cuts in a legislative bill.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
As I have no further speakers, I urge my colleagues to support this bipartisan, commonsense bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.
But that is not a justification for an individual member of a collaborative body to make a unilateral decision to turn over confidential information.
I think if you ask most people out in the public, there is actually the opinion that there is an unlimited guarantee to this space, and that is not true.
There is no rational reason, if you think about it, why a superior tax lien would be having an interest rate of 10, 11, 12 percent when a lien subordinate to it is going at 4 percent or 5 percent.





