I got alarmed by that, because quite often that is the way people perceive that democracy works. You get some people kind of at the center of the democracy and they say, well, we represent this perspective and this perspective, one marginally on the progressive side and one marginally on the conservative side, and we represent America, so the rest of America should not be heard. That is what this rule reminds me of. A small group of people who have decided that this bill should be the vehicle for election reform have gotten together; and the Committee on Rules has said, well, if we break apart this fragile compromise and allow people either on the progressive side or on the conservative side to offer amendments, then somehow democracy will be undermined. There is something wrong with that analysis. We all come here to represent our districts and to bring our voices to the table, and this process is not allowing that to happen. I hope we will vote down this rule and give us the opportunity to participate.
Melvin Watt: “I got alarmed by that, because quite often that is the way people perceive that democracy works. You get some people…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about a rule limiting amendments to a bipartisan election reform bill.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
It is intolerable to me to think that a mere accusation of impropriety would somehow deny him the presumption of innocence.
unequivocally . . . it is the role of Congress, not FHFA, to make the decisions that chart the path out of conservatorship and to the future housing finance system.
Woman, I thank the gentleman for yielding. I am pained to be here today in opposition to this bill. I stood shoulder to shoulder with the chair of our full committee 2 years ago in patent reform after working almost 6 years to find…
Congress has given us this mandate: Do lending, back loans that are safe and sound, and provide liquidity in the market.





