Mr. Chairman, before we rush to judgment on this, I think we ought to at least let our colleagues and the American people know what we are doing here. In the spirit, whether it is bipartisanship or whatever, the American people deserve the right to know that we are saying, out of one side of our mouth, that we should be staying out of the States' business and we have now set upon a series of amendments that inject the Federal Government further and further and further into the business that has typically been the reserve of the State. I will say to my colleagues that the Federal Government has no juvenile law. We do not deal with juveniles in the Federal system. We do not have laws in Federal system that deal with juvenile delinquency. Most States have a whole system that they have put in place over years and years and years to deal with juvenile delinquents.
Melvin Watt: “Mr. Chairman, before we rush to judgment on this, I think we ought to at least let our colleagues and the American…”
On the recordFebruary 9, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the implications of federal amendments on state juvenile justice systems.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
Dec 5, 2013
Woman, I thank the gentleman for yielding. I am pained to be here today in opposition to this bill. I stood shoulder to shoulder with the chair of our full committee 2 years ago in patent reform after working almost 6 years to find…
Sep 26, 2018
I will not hesitate to use my full subpoena power to compel cooperation where necessary.
May 22, 2018
The real problem was that I think because there was this competition to make money for the private sector, there developed a race to the bottom.
Sep 26, 2018
I am a big supporter of the MeToo Movement. I think it is a wonderful thing, but it cannot be a substitute for going through the legal process.





