When a manufacturer in Prague manufactures a dangerous product, knowing or in reasonable judgment should know that that product is going to end up here in the United States, the question becomes whether we should protect the manufacturer in Prague or whether we should protect the individual citizen in Nebraska or North Carolina or Michigan or Illinois or Ohio, what is our responsibility and what are the public policy considerations here? I want to submit to the chairman that if that manufacturer in Prague knows or reasonably should have known that the individual citizen in Nebraska could end up being injured by that dangerous product, it is our responsibility, as Members of this Congress, to protect American citizens and not to look out for the manufacturer in Prague. So that is the choice we have got, and it is just a matter of fairness.
Melvin Watt: “When a manufacturer in Prague manufactures a dangerous product, knowing or in reasonable judgment should know that that…”
On the recordFebruary 29, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing the responsibility of manufacturers for dangerous products in relation to American citizens.
Share
More from Melvin Watt
Sep 26, 2018
It is intolerable to me to think that a mere accusation of impropriety would somehow deny him the presumption of innocence.
Dec 5, 2013
Woman, I thank the gentleman for yielding. I am pained to be here today in opposition to this bill. I stood shoulder to shoulder with the chair of our full committee 2 years ago in patent reform after working almost 6 years to find…
Oct 28, 2013
I simply wanted to rise and pay tribute to the memory of my dear friend and colleague, Major Owens, who passed last week. I express my condolences to his family. As new Members, we take for granted sometimes that there is a system in place…





