The Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act establishes the use of a mixed-motive standard, settling the confusing separation of related civil rights claims and strengthening workers' rights. We should reject the Foxx amendment because prohibitions on retaliation do not punish employers multiple times for the same offense; rather, they help to deter employers from punishing employees multiple times--first, by discriminating and denying the equal opportunity, then again by punishing employees for challenging that discrimination. Mr. Speaker, I urge a ``no'' vote on this amendment, and I urge a ``yes'' vote on the underlying bill, H.R. 2062.
Kathy Manning: “The Protecting Older Workers Against Discrimination Act establishes the use of a mixed-motive standard, settling the…”
Share
More from Kathy Manning
Last week, I traveled with my colleagues to Normandy to commemorate the 80th anniversary of D-Day, the battle that turned the tide of World War II and led to the defeat of the Nazis. I met 100-year-old Air Force Tech Sergeant Chuck…
As the designee of the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Gottheimer), I have an amendment at the desk. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Clerk will designate the amendment. The text of the amendment is as follows: Page 4, after line 9, insert the…
After the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, we knew extreme MAGA Republicans wouldn't stop with attacking abortion rights. We knew they would come for birth control. I introduced the Right to Contraception Act to codify the right to…
I thank my good friend, the ranking member from New York (Mr. Morelle). I rise today in strong support of H.R. 7764, and I recognize my dear friend, Representative Wasserman Schultz, for her leadership on this effort. Mr. Speaker, the…





