I bring that up only because the House now has rulings pertaining to unfunded mandates. And even though I think this is a very good amendment, and one that adds to the bill, I just wanted to be sure that we did not fall into that trap. I compliment the gentlewoman for her amendment and urge its support.
Discussing an amendment related to unfunded mandates during House debate.
Share
More from John Shaw
Reclaiming my time, I do not believe that the pay-go is looking towards the Office of Management and Budget as having to certify things before we do it.
Yes, as sad as that is. There are some bright people on the other side of the aisle that could really help us get this thing done. When I did welfare reform back in 1996, we finally got some help from the other side and President Clinton…
I can see both sides of pay-go, but I cannot see both sides of delegating legislative authority to the executive branch no matter who controls the executive branch.
However, you cannot judge a bill by what is not in it. You judge it by what is in it. You cannot win a ball game by designing each play for a touchdown. You move the ball down the field. This is just one piece of legislation, a very…
Other voices in this conversation
