The Supreme Court has chosen to consider a case that will reevaluate settled law and, once again, throw into the question nearly 50 years of precedent.
G. K. Butterfield: “The Supreme Court has chosen to consider a case that will reevaluate settled law and, once again, throw into the…”
On the recordFebruary 11, 2020
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Butterfield expresses concern over the Supreme Court's review of established abortion law.
Share
More from G. K. Butterfield
Jul 27, 2022
I represent one of thirteen districts in North Carolina. And, as all of you certainly know, the Rucho case originated in my State, as well as the Moore v. Harper case.
Jul 27, 2022
The State supreme court ruled that the congressional map was an extreme, intentional partisan gerrymander and directed legislature to fix it.
Jul 27, 2022
We took the case into Federal court, and the lower Federal courts ruled in our favor and ruled that the State legislature engaged in partisan gerrymandering and that it was a violation of the Federal Constitution.
May 24, 2022
Just because you have high turnout doesn't mean that bad laws aren't barriers to voting.





