Today we begin debate on the Republicans' unfortunate effort to repeal health care reform. I pray that this debate today is civil and that it is respectful. As you know, Mr. Speaker, and many of our colleagues know, I served as a judge in my State for many years. I understand what it means to be objective and to have a fair debate. And I know there are usually two sides to every issue. But when it comes to repealing the reforms that Democrats have passed, I just can't figure it out. Why would Republicans add $230 billion to the deficit when their mantra has been deficit reduction? Why would Republicans force small businesses to pay higher taxes after fighting for cuts? Why would Republicans take away a parent's right to cover their adult children? And why in the world would Republicans make seniors pay more for their prescription drugs? I just don't understand. It appears to me that this may be partisan politics.
G. K. Butterfield: “Today we begin debate on the Republicans' unfortunate effort to repeal health care reform. I pray that this debate today…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the Republican effort to repeal health care reform and its potential consequences.
Share
More from G. K. Butterfield
In closing, let me thank the gentlewoman from Michigan for supporting this amendment. It is a very simple amendment. It is a very commonsense amendment. It will allow and authorize nonprofit organizations, as Mrs. Dingell said, to compete…
I say to the gentleman that I am prepared to close. Mr. Davis is my friend, and I want the world to know that. I reserve the balance of my time.
Just because you have high turnout doesn't mean that bad laws aren't barriers to voting.
What was struck down was Section 4, which is the formula that decides which States, which counties, which cities are included in Section 5.





