the Nation's attention has been focused on the economic plight of our inner cities, but I believe that the economic well-being of rural America has reached a critical point and deserves our immediate attention. Rural communities are rapidly losing population as jobs dry-up. From 1980-1990, the census showed more than 50 percent of the country's rural counties lost population. Average rural unemployment for the decade was almost 9 percent. Furthermore, by the beginning of this decade, almost a quarter of all farm households had incomes below the poverty line, more than twice the national average. In my rural 1st District of North Carolina, the average poverty rate is 26 percent. Mr. Speaker, it is time for Congress to take action to unlock the potential economic power of rural America. In a time of limited Federal resources, we in Congress must seize upon the opportunities available to leverage private resources and ensure that existing programs are used to their utmost. We all know that agriculture and its related industries are the economic pillars upon which rural communities were built. But over the years, agriculture and rural businesses have changed dramatically. In this context, I believe that Congress must act now to adapt public policy to meet the challenges facing rural America.
Eva M. Clayton: “the Nation's attention has been focused on the economic plight of our inner cities, but I believe that the economic…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the economic challenges facing rural America during a Congressional speech.
Share
More from Eva M. Clayton
the infrastructure provisions in this amendment provide $45 million annually for 10 years and would allow communities that the gentlewoman and I know are 5,000, 3,000, small communities, and even nonprofit organizations in the…
I was about to ask the gentleman if he is suggesting that he would be willing to restate it, all the legal immigrants, plus your provision, if they had some standard? Is that a 5-year standard, a 4-year standard?
I think both of my colleagues' points are very timely, and it has to be understood in the context of our wanting to have a program that would have an impact immediately, that would not be a permanent fix, meaning that we want something…
I am very appreciative of what the gentleman has done. I am only saying as a rural-urban allocation, those of us who live in rural communities do not benefit from the program in the same way. I urge the gentleman to work with us during the…





