I am very much aware, and we all are, that the statute of limitations was not applicable to the First Lady's business. But as a member of a Rose Law Firm, as the attorney involved, and as a billing attorney involved in this--and she was the billing attorney on Castle Grande--she would certainly have a responsibility, maybe not a personal financial responsibility, but she very much would be involved in the proceedings.
Discussing the legal responsibilities of the First Lady in relation to the Rose Law Firm.
Share
More from Duncan Faircloth
There is great conversation that we are going into these attorney settlements with tobacco companies; that that is wrong; that we shouldn't do that; we are interfering in a private contract. Yet, we are telling the tobacco companies…
We have detailed every dime of the expenditure, and now we have opposition to detailing the attorney fees.
If they submit a record, they will have to submit a record to the Congress. And of course it would be perjury to lie about it. They have to submit the record. Yes, I am saying they are going to be held responsible. And to the same fees…
Therefore, may I assume that the chairman would support a reprogramming request from any branch of the Department of Defense if that branch found that unavoidable delays in its other programs made funding available for the NATAC?
Other voices in this conversation
