Madam Chair, although I am not in opposition to the amendment, I do wish to speak in support and further explain my support, because I believe that the gentleman from Virginia offers some very good merit to his amendment. The amendment clarifies that the commissioners are covered by the Ethics in Government Act, which is in line with current law. Commissioners should be free from financial conflict as much as any other Federal employee should. The Beyer amendment prohibits the appointment of a commissioner to the retrospective regulatory review commission who has been a registered lobbyist in the previous 2 years. Ensuring commissioners are not lobbyists with financial interests in the commission's work is in line with the commission's goal of identifying wasteful or unfair regulations. The 2-year ban allows genuine experts with some past lobbying experience to contribute their knowledge to the commission. This provision is very similar to the President's 2-year ban on former lobbyists working in the administration. For those reasons, I do support the amendment. Madam Chair, I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Deborah Koff Ross
I believe it is a disservice to our Nation's scientific enterprise when there are attempts to make regulators judge research outside of the regulatory context.
Mr. Speaker, for 3 years, Ukraine has fought for its survival against Russia's brutal assault. For 3 years, America has supported the Ukrainian people in their brave fight for freedom. Mr. Speaker, Trump is halting military aid, blocking…
Mr. Speaker, I am proud to lead H.R. 7339, which updates title 51 of the U.S. Code with new legislation enacted into law after 2010. This title is known as the National and Commercial Space Programs, and so much of that new legislation…
It is my pleasure to showcase just a few statistics about our program this year that highlight the diversity of the Congressional Study Groups' programming. In the past year, the study groups have led five study tours for Members of…





