As we pointed out yesterday, the SCRUB Act requires the commission to identify regulations that should be repealed. The commission focuses on rules and regulations that are out of date, no longer useful, and otherwise unnecessary or obsolete. As I stated yesterday, no regulations should be exempt from this bill. Not all consumer protection regulations are created equal. If the regulation is important, effective and still relevant, then let it stand. If the regulation is not effective, no longer valuable and unnecessary, then why keep it around? This amendment is just another wrong-headed carve-out that will end up hurting student loan borrowers more than it could possibly help them. And for those reasons, Mr. Chairman, I urge my colleagues to oppose this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Deborah Koff Ross: “As we pointed out yesterday, the SCRUB Act requires the commission to identify regulations that should be repealed. The…”
Share
More from Deborah Koff Ross
I rise today to condemn the Trump administration's deployment of CBP to North Carolina. Since last weekend, North Carolinians watched in horror as masked agents descended on our State, terrorizing communities, and abducting people off the…
in November, my home State of North Carolina watched in horror as Federal immigration agents descended on our State and terrorized our communities. During these raids, my constituent Fatima Velasquez-Antonio, was detained. She has work…
While my colleagues on the other side of the aisle are leveling claims of a partisan prosecution, I want to remind the Committee that this is not the first time that a former Presidential candidate has been indicted for having hush money…





