With the obvious competitive advantage that a bridge holding company has, you also have a situation that is so contrary to market forces that says where you have increased risk, you may have increased return, and so if I am a shareholder in a company that is now part of a bridge holding company, my risk is almost eliminated; is that not true?
Deborah Koff Ross: “With the obvious competitive advantage that a bridge holding company has, you also have a situation that is so contrary…”
Editor's note · Context
Ross questions the risk elimination for shareholders in bridge holding companies.
Share
More from Deborah Koff Ross
I thank the ranking member for yielding me time. Mr. Speaker, Article III of our Constitution vests judicial power of the United States in the Supreme Court and lower courts. The Constitution says that this power extends to all cases…
I thank the Chair, and it is good to see the Chair in the chair. It is a pleasure, my friend. I also want to congratulate Representative Bice on her exceptional leadership to the House Administration Subcommittee on Modernization. It is my…
I rise with grave concern about reports that President Trump is scheming to eliminate the Department of Education and similar concerns about legislation that has been introduced to do just that. This move would be detrimental for Wake…





