I thank the gentlewoman for clarifying that. There is a lot of confusion about this amendment. The VIPR teams aside, let me just say that to put in this bill a blanket prohibition against TSA officers operating outside of an airport is overly broad and really would be damaging with respect to the things our screeners often are asked to do. Some screeners do assist in passenger screening at transit facilities, for example, and sometimes they are asked to help in screening at national security events. I am told there may be a role at the national conventions or events of that sort where a surge capacity is called for. Now, some discretion, some good judgment is called for in the use of these personnel, but it escapes me why, in an appropriations bill, we would want to write in a blanket prohibition of this sort when there are demonstrable uses for these personnel outside the airport that are very valuable and contribute to our security. So I urge defeat of the amendment, and yield back the balance of my time.
On the recordJune 7, 2012
Share & report
More from David Price
May 24, 2021
I think the best thing we can do, you know, diplomatically in terms of our geopolitical situation is just help people around the world.
Jun 8, 2021
it is absolutely imperative that the duly appropriated funds with bipartisan approval that were directed toward defense priorities and unconstitutionally diverted from that to pursue this border wall folly, it is absolutely imperative that…
Apr 28, 2021
How do we do something about this unrestrained, uncontrolled declaration of emergencies?
Mar 24, 2021
With respect to Gaza and the West Bank and the deeply destructive policies of the last administration, halting duly appropriated assistance funds to the West Bank and Gaza, closing the U.S. Consulate in Jerusalem, closing the PLO office in…





