I hear time and time again from the other side they are for salvage sales. We had salvage sales. Then we had an appeals process that rendered salvage sales useless because the appeals would go on for years. Most of us know this timber has to be cut within 6 to 24 months. So it rendered the whole question of salvage moot, and they know that, because they want no lumber cut, no timber cut in forests. Today in the Committee on Resources there was a host of people from Montana. The gentleman says he watches tree by tree. Commissioners and foresters were there testifying saying salvage is the greatest thing that has happened to Montana. I would suggest the gentleman talk to those people. They are probably still in town.
Charles Taylor: “I hear time and time again from the other side they are for salvage sales. We had salvage sales. Then we had an appeals…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of salvage sales and appeals on timber cutting in Montana.
Share
More from Charles Taylor
Reclaiming my time, we would accept the gentleman's amendment under that representation. Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
I raise a point of order. We have an agreement. I do not think we can strike the last word when we have a time agreement. Would the chairman rule on that and inform me? The Acting CHAIRMAN. Under the order of the House of earlier today…
I am not qualified to speak on why the intelligence service says this, but I would yield to a gentleman to make a comment about who is qualified to make statements on that.
I thank you, Congressman McHenry. I appreciate your leadership on this important issue and assure you that I will look forward to working with you on this issue. The committee will be in contact with EPA on the monitoring of PM 2.5…





