Mr. Chairman, I have to reluctantly oppose the gentleman's amendment. I do not believe we should prejudge on an individual basis the outcome of these competitive sourcing studies. As the gentleman knows, I have included language in this bill which directs the agencies to complete all ongoing studies and report to the committee before taking any specific actions. We did this for several reasons. We are concerned that 50 percent of the National Park Service jobs are rated commercial in nature. We are also concerned that the agencies have been spending money without reprogramming to the committee for approval. While the Department of Interior seems to be doing a good job, we must insist that they follow the congressional rules because we are not a potted plant. We are here to maintain the Department and do our duty. I would ask the gentleman, however, to consider withdrawing his amendment and assure him that we will try to work with him on this, if possible.
Charles Taylor: “Mr. Chairman, I have to reluctantly oppose the gentleman's amendment. I do not believe we should prejudge on an…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to competitive sourcing studies during a committee discussion.
Share
More from Charles Taylor
I do share the gentleman's sentiments about the accessibility of quality care for our Nation's veterans. North Carolina has also experienced an influx of veterans in recent years and the failure of this VA pilot program is a setback in our…
I understand there is opposition being included in the Special Resource Study currently being conducted by the National Park Service. Would the gentleman agree to work with the ranking member and myself to see if we can resolve that?
I am aware of this situation. I understand that the Environmental Protection Agency should soon be releasing the results of the March audit for the Catawba area. Mr. McHENRY. I thank the chairman. It is also my understanding of the EPA…
Mr. Chairman, today we bring before the House for fiscal year 2004 appropriations a bill for the Department of the Interior and related agencies. This is a good bill that balances many competing needs and stays within the 302(b)…





