I rise in support of H.R. 2846, a bill prohibiting any new Federal testing without specific congressional authority. Let me first say that we do not need another achievement test for our Nation's students. Let me name a few of the tests we already have in existence. The Stanford Achievement Test, the Iowa Test of Basic Skills, the Comprehensive Test of Basic Skills, the National Assessment of Educational Progress, known as NAEPS, and the Third International Math and Science Study, known as TIMMS. Again, these are just a few of tests currently used to assess student performance. So let us focus now for a moment on TIMMS. It is the largest study of educational achievement undertaken so far. There are 45 countries participating. Five grades are assessed in two school subjects, and approximately one million students tested in 31 languages. Through this study we already know how students in this country are performing in math and science, so why do we need another math test?
Cass Ballenger: “I rise in support of H.R. 2846, a bill prohibiting any new Federal testing without specific congressional authority. Let…”
Editor's note · Context
Supporting H.R. 2846, a bill to prohibit new Federal testing without congressional authority.
Share
More from Cass Ballenger
In my own hometown of Hickory, North Carolina, we have 47 hosiery mills, and they were being worked against substantially by imports from China and South Korea. We also have a little place called Catawba Valley Technical Institute, where…
the Raleigh News & Observer headline this past Sunday said, ``North Carolina's Trade Deficit Soars: Manufacturing Slide Continues Despite Decline in Dollar.'' One in four North Carolinians employed in manufacturing have lost their jobs…
today is another day that will live in infamy Americans are not used to attacks on our citizens, especially on our own soil. And America will not stand for it. Today's cowardly attacks were made by those who despise freedom. Well, I have…
I have continually criticized the Norwood-Dingell-Ganske bill because of the liability language which threatens the employer-based system of health care. The Norwood amendment excludes employers from being held liable for selecting a…





