I have been wrestling with the phrase of ``a do-nothing Congress.'' If by ``doing nothing'' the Democrats mean that we are protecting the social security trust fund from being raided to pay for other big government programs, then they are right. Or if they mean we have stopped racking up the national debt and borrowing money from our children, yes, I guess they are right there, too. If they call us ``the do-nothing'' Congress because we have worked to lower taxes on married couples and our Nation's seniors, then I guess they are right there. But if the Democrats' best argument for saying that we do not do anything is that we have worked to restrain Federal spending, to protect the retirement security for seniors, stop increasing taxes on hard-working Americans, then I am willing to take that as a compliment from my friends on the other side.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the label of 'do-nothing Congress' in response to Democratic criticisms.
Share
More from Cass Ballenger
Mr. Speaker, section 527 of the ``Foreign Relations Authorization Act, fiscal years 1994 and 1995,'' sanctions or stops certain U.S. bilateral assistance and U.S. support for assistance from International Financial Institutions for a…
Mr. Chairman, many critics for the national endowments believe funding given to the NEA goes only to museums in big cities. As a former member of the National Council, I can assure the Members that rural communities receive more funding…
It is very unfortunate that Californians have to go through these blackouts, and it is unfair to the people in California. But what is really unfair is that Californians have a Governor who refuses to take leadership and responsibility for…
I understand the need to support Iraq in its quest to become a free democracy. I still believe we did the right thing. But I also recognize that there must be greater attention for those who need help in the United States. In no way does…





