The issue with your characterization, sir, is number one, someone who enters illegally must be convicted of illegally entering the country. Then they must be convicted of illegally reentering the country to get a felony conviction. There is no compulsion to charge the most serious layers of this offense. There is prosecutorial discretion. Under this law, if someone is apprehended, they can be deported without any charging, and that is where the misconception and the mischaracterization is. If someone is convicted of illegal reentry and deported and they come back, a prosecutor would have the discretion to charge the 10-year minimum. It is not compulsory. It is within the discretion but, yes, he would meet the element.
Brad Knott: “The issue with your characterization, sir, is number one, someone who enters illegally must be convicted of illegally…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the legal implications of illegal entry and reentry in immigration law.
Share
More from Brad Knott
I am proud to lead this legislation to bolster the Trump administration's efforts to identify and combat threats from this transnational criminal organization and prevent further violence.
I rise today in order to commemorate the extraordinary story and mission of one of my neighbors and her family in North Carolina, someone by the name of Olivia Wooten. Olivia is currently suffering mightily in a battle with ALS. I have…
I am continuing on in the same spirit that was referenced by my colleague: ``To bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance.'' Mr. Speaker, all of us as elected leaders and the leaders around this country, we do have a solemn…
I will say that my friend from Maryland mentioned robbery, rape, and murder. This bill's goal is to apprehend dangerous criminals before they rob, rape, or murder Americans. Secondly, and most importantly, referencing a farmworker, if they…





