As the lead sponsor of this particular amendment, it does not hold any water for me because, as was reported in the papers, I have had individuals work for me who profess to the fact that they are homosexual, and despite that, I recognize publicly that they have done a great job in my office. I have even presented an award to one of those individuals so he would have a scholarship to go to school and further his education. So anybody who tries to make a case as far as this individual is concerned of animus in their debate, somehow there is animosity, it will not hold water. In fact, what this issue is about, No. 1, is any individual who wants to profess a lifestyle that incorporates same-sex marriage, that is their personal decision, but the debate is they simply do not have a right to change the definition of marriage, and that is what this debate is all about.
Wayne Allard: “As the lead sponsor of this particular amendment, it does not hold any water for me because, as was reported in the…”
On the recordJuly 13, 2004
Said by
Wayne Allard
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the amendment related to same-sex marriage and the definition of marriage.
Share
More from Wayne Allard
Dec 14, 2007
I rise in support of this FHA reform package. I do not think this is the time for us to take choices away from homeowners and consumers. This helps provide additional choices for homeowners with some safeguards. The FHA reverse mortgage…
Feb 25, 2013
And we had the MTBE versus ethanol, and that was a big debate, and it was to reduce the air pollution.
Dec 13, 2007
I am involved because farmers and ranchers all over the country are being impacted by their land values since the Supreme Court's ruling in Kelo. As was stated by the Farm Bureau, farmers and ranchers have been particularly vulnerable to…