I think it was extremely damaging. I mean, you've got the jury there listening to this doctor that's there for the defense, actually admitting and saying that, 'Look, this is not the standard of care that I would have used, and I'm the expert for the defendant.'
Paul Henderson: “I think it was extremely damaging. I mean, you've got the jury there listening to this doctor that's there for the…”
Editor's note · Context
Paul Henderson discusses the damaging testimony of the defense's expert witness in the trial.
Share
More from Paul Henderson
One of the things that stood out to me that she said was that she believed that when he pulled the trigger of that gun, he believed he was in fear of his life.
Maryland’s housing is expensive mainly because we haven’t built enough homes in the places people want to live.
I like that he elevated the approach and the elevated the observations about stand your ground and asked about at the end of the day what are the outcomes, the measured outcomes associated with stand your ground and really asking everyone…
Look, here's the thing. And it's very disappointing and challenging. And you know, I believe in the criminal justice system. But I disagree with this verdict.