Senator, I have consistently, not picking out Griswold or any other particular case, I have drawn a line that I think is required of a good judge to be fair and to respect the separation of powers, without respect to precedent.
Neil Gorsuch: “Senator, I have consistently, not picking out Griswold or any other particular case, I have drawn a line that I think is…”
Editor's note · Context
Gorsuch emphasizes the importance of respecting judicial precedent.
Share
More from Neil Gorsuch
I would tell you that Roe versus Wade decided in 1973, is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It was reaffirmed in Casey in 1992 and in several other cases.
when confronted with coercive prosecutorial tactics designed to induce defendants to take plea deals, the Court has often condoned those practices or let them pass in silence.
[o]ne can only hope the political branches and future courts will do their duty to honor this Nation's promises even as we have failed today to do our own.
Accepting the commission's argument that Texas and Fasken could not seek review of its licensing decision requires us to ignore the full scope of the agency's own licensing proceeding.