This case had nothing to do with direct contributions and spending coordinated with specific campaigns and candidates.
Neil Gorsuch: “This case had nothing to do with direct contributions and spending coordinated with specific campaigns and candidates.”
Editor's note · Context
Gorsuch clarifies that Citizens United is about independent speech, not direct campaign contributions.
Share
More from Neil Gorsuch
I would tell you that Roe versus Wade decided in 1973, is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It was reaffirmed in Casey in 1992 and in several other cases.
That Fourth Amendment test, which the Court invented in 1967, has no basis in the Constitution's text or history.
The government that kind of 'broad power to designate any group as dangerous and thereby disqualify its members from having a gun,' would risk allowing it to 'quickly swallow' the Second Amendment.
It asks us to believe that the very state in which the agency intends to store spent nuclear fuel indefinitely cannot be heard in court to complain about the agency's plans.