It asks us to believe that the very state in which the agency intends to store spent nuclear fuel indefinitely cannot be heard in court to complain about the agency's plans.
Editor's note · Context
Gorsuch emphasizes the absurdity of denying Texas a voice in the proceedings.
Share
More from Neil Gorsuch
the State took steps that, it said, would help ensure that a variety of other nongovernmental entities and governmental agencies would continue to provide access to necessary medical care and important women’s health and family planning…
When I became a judge, they gave me a gavel, not a rubber stamp. And nobody comes to my court expecting a rubber stamp.
Apart from pointing to habitual drunkard laws, the government has not even attempted to prove that any other specific historical principle might justify its prosecution in this case.
Isn’t it a fundamental premise of our First Amendment that the state shouldn’t be picking and choosing between religions?