It asks us to believe that the very state in which the agency intends to store spent nuclear fuel indefinitely cannot be heard in court to complain about the agency's plans.
Neil Gorsuch: “It asks us to believe that the very state in which the agency intends to store spent nuclear fuel indefinitely cannot be…”
Editor's note · Context
Gorsuch emphasizes the absurdity of denying Texas a voice in the proceedings.
Share
More from Neil Gorsuch
I would tell you that Roe versus Wade decided in 1973, is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It is a precedent of the United States Supreme Court. It was reaffirmed in Casey in 1992 and in several other cases.
We divide power in a way that was quite unique. Federalism. You can think of separation of powers as having a horizontal axis and a vertical axis.
The Supreme Court of the United States has held in Roe vs. Wade that a fetus is not a person. That’s the law of the land. I accept the law of the land.
Doesn’t it entangle the state tremendously when it has to go into a soup kitchen, send an inspector in, to see how much prayer is going on?