On the recordJune 24, 1997
I think that the last vote overwhelmingly decided this issue. Income-related premiums are fair. I just point out that by delaying it 2 years, we would lose something like $1.3 billion in a program that is already in difficulty. These funds are necessary and they are needed. Mr. President, if a means test is fair in 2 years, then it is fair today. I see no reason for the delay. Let me remind my colleagues that the premium increase is very modest, given the part B benefits. I urge my colleagues not to waive the point of order.
Said by
Michael Roth
Source
govinfo.gov