As I mentioned earlier, there are some who seem to want the language of opposition but don't want the responsibility of opposition. If the case is that some believe we should have immediate withdrawal, then that ought to be put on the table in a context which would have the force of law and effect, and let us vote on that. I would vote against it, but let us vote on it.
Discussing the need for a formal vote on immediate withdrawal in a Senate debate.
Share
More from Judd Gregg
Yes, I do. And it's driven by people being concerned about carbon emissions and global warming, and common sense taking hold.
It makes no sense to close down nuclear reactors if they still have useful life.
It makes no sense whatsoever, and it's apparently--certainly makes no sense for the same people to be urgently arguing to deal with climate change and then either quiet or urgently opposed to nuclear power.