As I mentioned earlier, there are some who seem to want the language of opposition but don't want the responsibility of opposition. If the case is that some believe we should have immediate withdrawal, then that ought to be put on the table in a context which would have the force of law and effect, and let us vote on that. I would vote against it, but let us vote on it.
Discussing the need for a formal vote on immediate withdrawal in a Senate debate.
Share
More from Judd Gregg
The issue for nuclear is that, because it does these good things, like reduce carbon and have reliability and be part of the diversity mix, it gets no credit for this in the marketplace.
It makes no sense to close down nuclear reactors if they still have useful life.
If all the nuclear power plants were closed in this country, it's the equivalent of adding 115 million cars to the road.
Meeting state and national carbon reduction goals will be compromised without existing nuclear power plants.