For one moment, just to respond specifically to the language in the existing statute that says the President can, if he does certain things. Our language says, he cannot do it unless he does certain things. The end result is exactly the same. Our language says that if the President makes a determination that these things exist, he can do whatever he needs to do in this area. The language in the existing statute simply phrases it differently, by saying the President can do this if he shows the following. The end result is exactly the same.
John B. Breaux: “For one moment, just to respond specifically to the language in the existing statute that says the President can, if he…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the differences in language regarding presidential authority in existing and proposed statutes.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
I think it's hers to lose. I think it's the consensus among Democrats that I've talked to that she's clearly in the lead, is clearly the person that they have to beat.
My opinion is that in order to ever reach an agreement between the two parties, Congress is going to have to combine the best of what government can do with the best of what the private sector can do and put the two together.
I think the whole debate politically about ending Medicare as we know it, I think we want to change Medicare.
Just like my Chevy II, things have changed, things have improved, so our recommendation is that we keep Medicare of course.