For one moment, just to respond specifically to the language in the existing statute that says the President can, if he does certain things. Our language says, he cannot do it unless he does certain things. The end result is exactly the same. Our language says that if the President makes a determination that these things exist, he can do whatever he needs to do in this area. The language in the existing statute simply phrases it differently, by saying the President can do this if he shows the following. The end result is exactly the same.
John B. Breaux: “For one moment, just to respond specifically to the language in the existing statute that says the President can, if he…”
On the recordSeptember 26, 2002
Said by
John B. Breaux
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the differences in language regarding presidential authority in existing and proposed statutes.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
Jan 22, 2006
The fundraising and the traveling, things she's done for the party, I mean, she's a real rock star on the fundraising circuit.
Apr 26, 2012
I remember when I was in Congress when I wanted to stop something from happening, I used to offer an amendment to do a study, or maybe to do a demonstration program, hoping it never got completed.
Sep 16, 2003
I will just make a couple of comments in opposition to the resolution because I think the resolution is sort of a broad-brush approach that takes down everything the FCC has recommended, things that make sense that are good and also things…