It is a legitimate question. The short answer is yes, it is a requirement that after the 2 years, they have to engage in community service, workfare programs, located in that community. In other words, what we are saying is there is no free lunch. They are not going to be able to continue receiving benefits for not working if they are capable of working.
Discussing requirements for community service in relation to welfare benefits.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
Mr. President, and anyone who may be listening to this ``debate''-- which is really not a debate yet but probably will be a debate when we vote on Thursday when the time is allocated for Members to speak to present their positions on the…
I strongly support the Singapore and Chile Free Trade Agreements and believe they will promote domestic growth in manufacturing and exports. I look forward to seeing these agreements enacted into law. However, I am concerned about the…
I do not think it was so much a problem with the prison as it was with people who ran the prison. It is not the physical plant that caused the problem. It is the people who were running the prison. If we do demolish a prison, are we not…
would the Senator point out anything in the legislation before this body now that would take any action against any companies if they did not abide by what they said they were going to use it for? Do they lose their tax deduction? Is there…