It is a legitimate question. The short answer is yes, it is a requirement that after the 2 years, they have to engage in community service, workfare programs, located in that community. In other words, what we are saying is there is no free lunch. They are not going to be able to continue receiving benefits for not working if they are capable of working.
John B. Breaux: “It is a legitimate question. The short answer is yes, it is a requirement that after the 2 years, they have to engage in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing requirements for community service in relation to welfare benefits.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
It says if Congress passes this, we will veto it. It is very clear. The administration says the new FCC local and national media ownership rules more accurately reflect the changing media landscape and current state of network station…
Just like my Chevy II, things have changed, things have improved, so our recommendation is that we keep Medicare of course.
let me first express my appreciation for the very kind remarks of the chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. I think it is only appropriate to acknowledge that had it not been for his perseverance and determination, we would not be here…
Senator Landrieu and I rise today to add our voices to those who have been calling for a comprehensive national solution to the asbestos litigation problem. Several members of both parties have recently come to the floor to discuss this…