I have a few more comments. Logic should make this obvious. If you can provide energy that does not cost you any money--solar and wind, for example--is it not logical to put it in the mix? That is all we are saying. The Department of Energy agrees with us and says it will save money. I understand those from the oil-producing States do not want this provision, but common sense tells us it is the best thing we can do. Therefore, I urge my colleagues to vote against the amendment.
James M. Jeffords: “I have a few more comments. Logic should make this obvious. If you can provide energy that does not cost you any…”
On the recordApril 24, 2002
Said by
James M. Jeffords
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of including renewable energy sources in energy policy.
Share
More from James M. Jeffords
Jun 23, 2005
I thank Senator Grassley, Senator Baucus and the other members of the Senate Finance Committee for agreeing to my recycling amendment, which I call the Recycling Investment Saves Energy, RISE, provisions. These provisions were added to the…
Jul 29, 2005
exactly 1 month ago I praised the Appropriations Committee's efforts to fund the State Revolving Fund for Wastewater Treatment and for Drinking Water at the highest possible levels. Today, however, I am gravely concerned about the overall…
Sep 6, 2006
As you may know, International Paper is seeking a permit to burn tires at its facility in upstate New York.