I have a few more comments. Logic should make this obvious. If you can provide energy that does not cost you any money--solar and wind, for example--is it not logical to put it in the mix? That is all we are saying. The Department of Energy agrees with us and says it will save money. I understand those from the oil-producing States do not want this provision, but common sense tells us it is the best thing we can do. Therefore, I urge my colleagues to vote against the amendment.
James M. Jeffords: “I have a few more comments. Logic should make this obvious. If you can provide energy that does not cost you any…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the importance of including renewable energy sources in energy policy.
Share
More from James M. Jeffords
while we are nearing completion of this bill, I would like to take a few minutes to highlight some of the projects in the bill for my State of Vermont. Throughout our work on this bill, I have worked to find a way to use the Army Corps of…
These innovations have the potential to move us into an era when driving a car or truck will no longer mean causing dangerous global warming pollution or using up scarce resources.
last Thursday I submitted a statement expressing my concerns with the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the United States Supreme Court. I am here today to reiterate these concerns as we move toward a final vote on this nomination. There…
I want to address some statements made last week, during the debate on the Bingaman amendment No. 791, regarding community acceptance of renewable energy in Vermont. After I left the floor, one Senator tried to make a point in opposition…