This clearly sets out that, in their opinion, it would appear that, in its current form, our bill would not interfere or substantially negatively affect any of the FDA tobacco authority. In addition to that, just to be double and triple sure, we, in the bill, say it can't apply to tobacco and that the FDA has full authority in the tobacco area. So that is why we got the 89 to 5 vote today. Yet, I certainly commend the Senator from Massachusetts, and others, who want to make darn sure that we are really doing the job we think we are doing. I appreciate that and I think it is healthy. The harder that Senator Kennedy fights, the more the public will be aware of that, and I hope we have as good a vote this time.
James M. Jeffords: “This clearly sets out that, in their opinion, it would appear that, in its current form, our bill would not interfere or…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill on FDA tobacco authority during Senate debate.
Share
More from James M. Jeffords
today I am introducing the Tire Derived Fuel Safety Act of 2005 to ensure that Americans living near pulp and paper mills that burn tires for energy are protected from the potential harmful effects of air pollutants such as fine…
while we are nearing completion of this bill, I would like to take a few minutes to highlight some of the projects in the bill for my State of Vermont. Throughout our work on this bill, I have worked to find a way to use the Army Corps of…
exactly 1 month ago I praised the Appropriations Committee's efforts to fund the State Revolving Fund for Wastewater Treatment and for Drinking Water at the highest possible levels. Today, however, I am gravely concerned about the overall…
throughout my 30 years in the Congress, I have considered myself a free-trader. I believe that breaking down barriers to trade and opening access to markets in a fair and balanced way in the long run benefits all economies, both consumers…