This clearly sets out that, in their opinion, it would appear that, in its current form, our bill would not interfere or substantially negatively affect any of the FDA tobacco authority. In addition to that, just to be double and triple sure, we, in the bill, say it can't apply to tobacco and that the FDA has full authority in the tobacco area. So that is why we got the 89 to 5 vote today. Yet, I certainly commend the Senator from Massachusetts, and others, who want to make darn sure that we are really doing the job we think we are doing. I appreciate that and I think it is healthy. The harder that Senator Kennedy fights, the more the public will be aware of that, and I hope we have as good a vote this time.
James M. Jeffords: “This clearly sets out that, in their opinion, it would appear that, in its current form, our bill would not interfere or…”
On the recordSeptember 5, 1997
Said by
James M. Jeffords
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill on FDA tobacco authority during Senate debate.
Share
More from James M. Jeffords
Jan 30, 2006
last Thursday I submitted a statement expressing my concerns with the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the United States Supreme Court. I am here today to reiterate these concerns as we move toward a final vote on this nomination. There…
Jul 14, 2006
I see that as a possibility and would, with the concurrence of the four bill managers, support reasonable modifications to be allowable.
Jul 19, 2006
while we have a moment I would like to take some time to thank the staff from the Environment and Public Works Committee. Senator Inhofe's staff is first class, including Ruth Van Mark, Andrew Wheeler, Angie Giancarlo, Stephen Aaron, and…