The requirement for a definition would fall to the Congress under this amendment, which means it would be decided by statute. It is the intention of the Senator from Kentucky to solve the whole problem by statute from the beginning. The constitutional amendment would end up being subject to congressional definition, as I understand it, and we would be right back where we are right now. We would have put this symbol in the Constitution and not have resolved any of the issues the Senator from Kentucky raises. I think it is a very appropriate issue to be raised at this point. I can't give you a definition of what constitutes desecration of the flag.
Bill Bennett: “The requirement for a definition would fall to the Congress under this amendment, which means it would be decided by…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a constitutional amendment regarding flag desecration.
Share
More from Bill Bennett
If Herman Cain cannot stand up to these charges, if he refuses to, then he should step out of the race. A man big enough to run for president should be big enough to have a full and candid press conference on all of this.
In drug courts, America has found not only a solution to an important public policy problem, it has hit again upon an essential truth, the power of personal responsibility and accountability
I think he runs the choice of either being ineffectual if he doesn't get it or imperious, if he does. I don't think this is going to go down well.
I thought it was, if not a racist comment, a way out-of-touch comment.