It has been good working with the majority. We cannot agree on this amendment. Even the FDA has asked for this amendment. When they testified before our committee in January, they said the weakness is labeling. "The goal of pediatric exclusivity should be labeling," that is a quote from the FDA. Section 552 does not work in the real world; that is why we need this amendment.
Bart Stupak: “It has been good working with the majority. We cannot agree on this amendment. Even the FDA has asked for this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for an amendment related to pediatric exclusivity and FDA labeling during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Bart Stupak
I ask the Congress to recognize the generous contribution of the City of Marquette and urge the Coast Guard to perform this land transfer at no cost to the city. The city has already borne significant cost by transferring a new parcel of…
There's incident after incident, after incident within the last six months. It might seem like small things, but when you put them all together in a relatively short period of time, it really tells you how poorly this pipeline is being…
One of the first things Mr. McKay said was, 'I'm going to replace the ombudsman. I'm going to shut her down.'
The Stupak amendment was approved with the support of 64 Democrats, including House Appropriations Committee Chair David Obey.