it has been good working with the majority. We cannot agree on this amendment. Even the FDA has asked for this amendment. When they testified before our committee in January, they said the weakness is labeling. "The goal of pediatric exclusivity should be labeling," that is a quote from the FDA. Section 552 does not work in the real world; that is why we need this amendment.
Bart Stupak: “it has been good working with the majority. We cannot agree on this amendment. Even the FDA has asked for this…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the need for an amendment related to pediatric exclusivity and FDA labeling during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Bart Stupak
I rise to thank Chairwoman Slaughter and Chairman Rahall for accepting my amendment reaffirming the permanent ban on oil and gas drilling in and under the Great Lakes. I also want to thank Chairman Miller for joining with me in adding…
5 minutes is not nearly enough time to do justice to Congressman John Dingell's record-breaking 53 years of service in the U.S. House of Representatives, but I wish to highlight the profound impact his work has had on the lives of…
Mr. Chairman, as you know, the Coast Guard Station in Marquette, Michigan, relocated to a new location within the city of Marquette. The new location allows the Coast Guard to streamline their operations, be closer to the dock, and…
I wish the Republican leadership would talk to their members and tell them there's a proper decorum and let's be respectful. We set examples.